holisticsilikon.blogg.se

Acdsee pro 5 vs acdsee pro 10
Acdsee pro 5 vs acdsee pro 10











  1. #ACDSEE PRO 5 VS ACDSEE PRO 10 FOR MAC#
  2. #ACDSEE PRO 5 VS ACDSEE PRO 10 FULL#
  3. #ACDSEE PRO 5 VS ACDSEE PRO 10 PRO#

#ACDSEE PRO 5 VS ACDSEE PRO 10 PRO#

loading thumbnails into database) in ACDSee Pro is painfully slow compared to Imatch.Ĭategories in Imatch far more powerful than in any other app I have tried. During those two minutes my CPU is running at about 70% and everything is sluggish.ĪCDSee Pro: The speed of building up an image catalog (i.e. In Idimager it takes about two minutes for the queue to hit 0 every time I click on it. In Imatch it takes about one second to load the category. For example I have a category called Arizona that has 1200 images in it. So much so that it hard for me to use IdImager. IdImager: The overall speed of IdImager is much slower than Imatch. My conclusion is that both IdImager and ACDSee Pro show a lot of potential, but there are a few things that are keeping me from switching. I have been waiting two years for the new version of Imatch that is supposed to address most of my concerns and I am starting to lose patience. I have been testing out competing products to Imatch (IdImager and ACDSee Pro) to see if one of them is better and will be updated on a more regular basis.

acdsee pro 5 vs acdsee pro 10 acdsee pro 5 vs acdsee pro 10

Things I dislike about Imatch are the interface, lack of built in version tracking, it does not import EXIF camera data into the database for quick searches, search function are too difficult to use, overall ease of use is not very good plus a few other things I can not think of now. I love the stability, speed, power of categories and scripting abilities (as a last resort) of Imatch. First, I have been using Imatch for the last two years and have always had a love/hate relationship with it.

acdsee pro 5 vs acdsee pro 10

Now I need to test Bibble.I have been testing out IdImager, ACDSee Pro and Imatch the past few days and I thought I would pass on my conclusion. So not a clear win for Photo Mechanic by any means.

#ACDSEE PRO 5 VS ACDSEE PRO 10 FOR MAC#

ACDSee Pro allows be to paste the files in any other windows application.ĭespite reading the manual I could not figure out the hotkey command to only display files of a certain rating - the manual is written for MAC users so I've tried plenty of different combinations of ALT and CTRL but it did not work. The copy command is very quirky: rather than storing your files in a buffer ready to be released when you hit PASTE (there is no paste command!) - it opens a dialog box asking where you want to put your files. Why assign CTRL - Y to Copy? On all Windows applications copy is CTRL - C! I always get a few tool bars here and there in photo mechanic.

#ACDSEE PRO 5 VS ACDSEE PRO 10 FULL#

I did not find a way to browse thru images in full screen - with NOTHING else than the image. This is simply not acceptable when you're going thru 2000 photos quickly that you need to double check each time that your choice was indeed selected. I would hit ALT-1 to assign 1 star and nothing happened. BUT maybe 1 times out of 4 photo mechanic simply did not react to my key pressing - I would hit number 1 to assign color red to the photo and nothing happened. Reactivity: I enjoy Photo Mechanic's hotkeys to assign ratings and color codes to images - and especially the fact that this information is stored in the IPTC and not in a custom database. This might not seem like much but makes a world of difference to me. With ACDSee Pro I never have to wait for a photo to be displayed - not so with Photo Mechanic where I sometimes have to wait 1 or 2 seconds until the photo is displayed. Speed: much much slower than ACDSee in displaying images. I immediately spotted 2 problems compared with ACDSee Pro 2: I've tested the trial version of Phoot Mechanic last night.













Acdsee pro 5 vs acdsee pro 10